ORATS has a way to remove the effect of earnings announcements on implied volatility (IV).

Normalizing IV allows for a better way to study it historically and compare cross-sectionally. For example, in the days before an earnings announcement, IV can rise as much as 50% in the front month expirations. Much of this rise is due to traders expecting a large move after announcement. If observers are not able to remove this effect, the valuable information baked into IV may be lost.

Consider TSLA below where earnings were announced on 8/1 and after the gap between the IV with and without earnings narrowed in the graph below. This is why it is important to isolate just the ex-earnings IV if analyzing implied volatility over time.

To remove the implied earnings effect in the IV, ORATS follows these steps.

  • Make accurate implied volatility calculations by using accurate inputs like interest, dividends and residual rates;
  • Apply accurate earnings announcement dates to determine how many earnings apply to each expiration;
  • Solve for an implied earnings effect that makes the most rational resultant monthly implied volatility relationships;
  • Present monthly and constant maturity readings historically.

For example, consider LULU that announces earnings 8/30/2018 after the close. Presented below is the method for extracting earnings from IV. See the at-the-money IVs for each expiration, post removal of earnings effect IV, and that portion of the IV that is applicable to the earnings announcement move:

The 8/25/2018 expiry does not have an earnings effect. 8/31/2018 has the largest earnings effect (since the earnings effect will have a greater percentage of days relative to the number of days to expiration). Notice how the method solves for a remaining NEW IV skew that is still down sloping (backwardation).

The earnings effect is not the same as the percentage earnings move implied by the ATM IV relationships. In our Core Data API the percentage move implied from the options pricing for LULU is 10.93%.

impErnMv
10.93

Here are the last 12 actual earnings moves and the average absolute earnings move 11.698% to compare to the 10.93% Implied Earnings Move:

absAvgErnMv
11.698
ernMv1 ernMv2 ernMv3 ernMv4 ernMv5 ernMv6 ernMv7 ernMv8 ernMv9 ernMv10 ernMv11 ernMv12
16.316 9.211 6.4292 7.1937 11.5472 -23.4389 15.0401 -10.5531 -0.1327 -13.1327 -16.4091 10.972

 

https://blog.orats.com/2018/04/10/sign-up-for-the-premium-earnings-report 

 

related posts

Backtesting, AI, Machine Learning, and Fitness Functions in Options Explained
Mar
15
Markets, Backtesting

Backtesting, AI, Machine Learning, and Fitness Functions in Options Explained

I received a nice email from a client who had just listened to a podcast I co-hosted with Mark...

Read Post
Are You Still Using Close-to-Close Historical Volatility?
Mar
06
Volatility, Data

Are You Still Using Close-to-Close Historical Volatility?

"At 2:32 pm on May 6, 2010, the S&P 500 careened 8% in just 36 minutes before rebounding with...

Read Post

We're here, if you need us.

Still curious how we can help you?




LET'S CHAT